Showing posts with label access. Show all posts
Showing posts with label access. Show all posts

Monday, 12 November 2012

Hollywood Costume, Victoria and Albert Museum, London

7th November 2012

This is a wonderful exhibition and hits the right spot on audio, music and simulated movie making.  The exhibition covers what it says “on the tin” how it works and what makes it work.  http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/exhibitions/exhibition-hollywood-costume/

I was part of a visually impaired group and we had early access to the exhibition.  We gathered in the Exhibition Road entrance and were welcomed by Barry Ginley and Suzana Skrbic with a team of volunteers.  The V&A has an excellent team of volunteers who will both guide, read labels and describe some items and engage in discourse. For this morning’s viewing, I was teamed up with Marcia Drury.  We also had the time of the assistant curator Keith Lodwick. 

The exhibition is divided into three sections and before we entered the show Keith explained the layout, what we could expect, how we could interact with some of the exhibits and how we would walk past an iconic showing of characters ending up with Judy Garland’s blue gingham outfit and ruby slippers. 
 
Photograph of Prof Whitestick next to poster for Hollywood Costumes
(This has Judy Garland in the blue gingham dress for The Wizard of Oz)
Novemeber 2012
 
The V&A has made so much accessible in pdf format on its webpage.  These are so accessible they opened and my screenreader read them out to me straight away.   The links to these pdf files are as follows:




More information on the exhibition can be found on:
http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/exhibitions/exhibition-hollywood-costume/about-the-exhibition/

I am afraid some jaws dropped when I said I had mixed drinks for Charlie Chaplin in 1972, had seen Marlene Dietrich at Edinburgh Airport in 1962 and that Glenda Jackson was my MP at Westminster.  

In the first room, there are a variety of iconic pieces and Keith spent some time discussing the detail of how the costume was designed in tandem with the script screenplay and director meetings.  Unlike a theatre costume, which is designed to be exhibited in 3-D, a Hollywood costume was designed from the outset to appear as a 2 dimensional image within film.  Keith also mentioned that at no time were performances of films silent.  In other words, silent movies always had music played in the background.  When talking movies came into production, costume designs had to be completely re-thought to take account of noises from the movement of the costume and likely interference from a microphone on the set. 

We discussed at length the dress of Scarlett O’Hara which had been made from old curtains.  Although we couldn’t see much of the dress – in my case only the silhouette – we enjoyed the discussion on about how the dress would have been made, the sewing techniques in the book and the fading of the dress itself, with the addition of parts of the curtains incorporated into the outfit.  I mentioned that the curtains theme may have been copied by The Sound of Music, where Julie Andrews kits the von Trapp clan in costumes made from curtains of the mansion.  (There is an interesting curtain transfer to a chintz dress in the EF Benson Miss Mapp, available on talking books.) 

Charlie Chaplin’s outfit was discussed - hence my remark above.  We then moved on to discuss the assembly of monarchs such as Queen Christina, played by Greta Garbo; various Queen Elisabeths, played by Bette Davis, Glenda Jackson and Judi Dench; Mary Queen of Scots was there as was Joe Fiennes’s costume from Shakespeare in Love. 

We also discussed Harrison Ford’s outfit in Indiana Jones and how the worn jacket and hat became part of the image of the character in the mind of the audience.  This is also a key part of the costume design in ensuring that the character is instantly recognisable wherever they appear in the film.  In the case of Harrison Ford, costumes had to be designed for both body doubles and stunt men with appropriate continuity of aging processes.  All these had to be factored into the planning of the costume with actors and directors as well as others involved in the production. 

We spent some time discussing the denim jeans used in Brokeback Mountain.  Rodeo competition cowboys wore Wranglers, while ranch hands wore Levis.  (I bought my first pair of Levis - costing £2 19s 11d in 1968 - and the fashion at the time was to ‘age’ them with the aid of bleach, including the use of either Vim or Ajax!)  Brokeback Mountain by Annie Proux is available on Talking Books; and Proux discusses life in Wyoming in great detail, including descriptions of the costumes of the time – though, of course, the transfer to film requires a visual content, rather than a descriptive one. 

At this point, we also discussed the contents of Meryl Streep’s handbag in her portrayal of Mrs Thatcher.  The contents of the handbags of Mrs Thatcher, the Queen and the late Princess Margaret were often ‘revealed’ in various satirical magazines.

For the next stage in the exhibition, we could wander around and ‘engage’ with a variety of stars by sitting in chairs within discussions.  There are many montages, audio clips and a commissioned set of interviews with Meryl Streep and Robert de Niro.  With Marcia’s help, I was able to negotiate the various exhibits and sit down in a script meeting. 

We then reassembled and had a walk through the final gallery with many of the heroines and villains on display with many costumes.  I haven’t been to the cinema since 2001, though have seen the odd DVD on a laptop.  I had seen quite a few of the films for which costumes were on show up to 2000, as I could remember many of the Hollywood classics which were broadcast on black and white television, then on colour and often on very long aeroplane journeys.  I had only seen The Last Emperor on a DVD in the 1990s and it was amazing to hear of the number of costumes which had been made for this production.  New techniques such as CGI have changed the material of the costume, though not necessarily the material culture. 

Among the memorable costumes on display include John Travolta’s white suit for Saturday Night Fever, Edith Head’s design for Ginger Rogers in Lady in the Dark and Meryl Streep’s Cruella de Vil costume, the two outfits for the two Hepburns – Audrey and Kathreen; Superman and Spiderman.  There was a large installation for Star Wars characters as well.  (I can still say I’ve never seen Star Wars!)

The early entry had allowed us to avoid an initial bottleneck in the first Act and we were able to stay a little ahead.  Susan helped me in the shop to find some postcards.  I considered briefly buying a Harrison Ford (Indiana Jones) hat but settled for a postcard of Dick Tracey’s hat.  Postcards bought are as follows:

Hat from the costume for Dick Tracy
Dick Tracy, 2007
Costume designer: Milena Canonero
The collection of Motion Picture Costume Design

Costume for The Tramp
Costume designer: Charles Chaplin
Charles Chaplin TM

Replica of Ruby Slippers
Victoria and Albert Museum

Green “Curtain” Dress
Gone with the Wind, 1939
Costume designer: Walter Plunkett
Dacid O. Selznicj Collection
Harry Ransom Humanities Research Centre
The University of Texas, Austin

Lighting Levels: I asked about the lighting levels in the exhibition and Keith said that they were at 50 lux. Care is taken to ensure that the fabric of the costumes is not faded further.  Lighting levels and large displays allow some tricks on the eye. There is a little rollercoaster effect on walking through from time to time.  I found this particularly enjoyable with my peripheral vision.

Monday, 5 November 2012

Shared Space- Exhibition Road and a Tale of Two Museums

*** update 7/11/12

On 7th November 2012 I was photographed next to the shared space of Exhibition Road.  The timing of the picture was when no moving traffic was around in order that the paving layout could be shown in the photograph. 
 
Prof Whitestick by shared space on Exhibition Road
7 Novemeber 2012

Later, I had an opportunity to discuss this with someone from Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC) who was on an exhibition stand at Sight Village in Kensington Town Hall.  We exchanged views and I know that at least one other visually impaired person (another cane user) has complained of the diagonal pattern on the shared space paving. 

I find that when crossing the Exhibition Road, my peripheral vision is ‘confused’ with the diverging white lines which drift into the extreme limits of my field of view.  This really clouds out any ability to detect moving traffic.  I don’t think this was fully appreciated by whoever designed this pattern for Exhibition Road. 

The person from RBKC said drivers of cars were forced to realise that they were no longer in a normal road environment with the appearance the white diagonal grids. 

I’m personally not convinced by this as many experiments are done on motorways with road markings in an effort to cut speed.  Drivers still exceed 90 mph on a 70 mph motorway.  I have no idea how rigorously drivers who use Exhibition Road stick to the speed limit.

I had a Twitter exchange with Alastair Somerville (@acuity_design) on this and it’s copied below. 

@acuity_design RBKC had a stand in #sightvillage so had a chance to exchange views on #sharedspace in Exhibition Road

@ProfWhitestick anything about tactile info panel? We lost quite on 'urgent' work back in January

ProfWhitestick
@acuity_design No mention but another VI person with cane had complained of peripheral vision confusion with diagonal markings

Alastair Somerville 
.@ProfWhitestick good research on how bad an idea strong geometrical shapes on floor are for ppl with visual impairments.

ProfWhitestick
@acuity_design Apparently the patterns are to "confuse" the driver of car. a psychobabble experiment.

Alastair Somerville 
. @ProfWhitestick whole thing reminds me of Dazzle painting theory of ship camouflage. Which only worked if you didn't think about U Boats

@Acuity_Design @profwhitestick Call me old fashioned, with their history I'd say it seems a bit tasteless to have RBKC at #sightvillage.

ProfWhitestick
@traceyproudlock @acuity_design I suppose they paid the exhibitor who paid the Town Hall "owner" Still they did ask me.

Alastair Somerville
@TraceyProudlock @profwhitestick well, it is their town hall but still ironic given the policy issues of Ex Rd.

*** end of upate


9 October 2012

Introduction

Shared Space is a concept where all traffic - vehicular, bicycles and pedestrians - is allowed to interact in one common shared space.  An example of this is Exhibition Road in London, an area frequently visited for the many fine museums.  Access is from South Kensington Underground and its connecting tunnels.  

I have heard a lot about shared space and have made inputs through the usual channels, as well as sharing comments through Twitter with other twitter contacts.  I can often be found exchanging tweets with @Acuity_Design and with @Pellegrino5.  I have also been in touch with James White from GuideDogs and some links are on this post.   I have described the journey through the tunnel to the Victoria and Albert Museum (http://profwhitestick.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/ceramic-tiles-yellow-stove-of-von.html).

My first experience of the shared space itself was when I walked along Exhibition Road and noted the corduroy tactile indicating the end of the pedestrian zone.  I walked so far up and passed the other V&A entrance and turned to face the road itself.  I could make out diagonal paving lines (presumably for decoration for those looking down from a ‘plane), which I found distracting and really did not know what to make of them at street level.  They could be misunderstood as a safe way to cross. 
 
 
View of shared space on Exhibition Road
South Kensington, London
7th Novemeber, 2012

Many of the pedestrians were too busy in groups and I waited for silence, relatively, from the road and stepped into the road.  I could make out cars, taxis and bikes travelling up and down.  I crossed the road, coming across parked cars and bike racks and walked back in the direction of South Kensington Tube Station.  I found the tunnel and passed a museum which I took to be the old geology museum and the corner of the Natural History Museum.  I had returned home by getting my bearings and sense of direction from the tunnel’s direction and then with the help of the London Underground.

 
After my visit to the V&A in October, I decided to explore Exhibition Road further and left the V&A in Cromwell Road and turned right, up Exhibition Road.  I noted the other entrance to the V&A and thought I could make out the courtyard where I had had a coffee.  I followed the pedestrian zone and felt a heavy studded tactile indicating a road at right angles.  I assumed this was a service road and crossed it, walking up Exhibition Road to where I thought the Science Museum was.  I crossed the road, took an obvious wrong turning (in retrospect and with hindsight- daft concepts for visually impaired!) and entered a building which was in fact Imperial College. 

They were kind enough to tell me where the Science Museum was and I crossed another service road, studded tactiles, and thought I could make out a tunnel entrance.  At this point a teacher leading a group of schoolchildren shouted to her charges “Careful, there is a blind man here!”  I  asked if she knew where the entrance was and she replied that I was at the Science Museum Staff Entrance and that the entrance was “round the corner”. Again, with hindsight, she really meant that the entrance for school groups was round the corner but I went past this and again ended up in another part of Imperial College.   

I was told to go back and turn right at a statue (“you can’t miss it”) and the entrance was further down the road.  Funnily enough my knowledge of a piece of Tony Cragge sculpture stood me in good stead and I found the entrance to the Science Museum. 

On entering, I asked a guard for assistance and was taken to the information desk.  I asked what there was for a visually impaired visitor like me and was not impressed by what happened next.  (Again, with hindsight perhaps I should have informed them that I was coming and asked if they had special events.)  I stood my ground and insisted on speaking to someone. 

Other people were being given instructions for the Watson and Crick model of DNA and they hadn’t booked in advance. After lots of phone calls someone from “Front of House” came down to speak to me. I was told that I ought to have made prior arrangements and that I was engaging with a Front of house Staff team who “had not been trained in dealing with visually impaired people”. I was determined that I was not going to go away empty handed and insisted being taken to the Watson and Crick model and a MRI scanner.  This was duly done but, I felt, grudgingly.  Again, I was told to contact Nicola Dee prose (who was out at lunch).

I saw the DNA model and the object label was read to me. The MRI scanner was also done.  In passing some displays beside a car I asked what it was and found, to my delight, that it was a display about Perkins discovery of the synthesis of alizarin and other pigments, dyes and the founding of the modern organic chemical industry.   By now I was engaged with someone “who had not been trained” and also saw the Ripley Manuscript on Alchemy (it is shorter than Jack Kerouac manuscript of On the Road in the British Library- that is another story.) 

I was helped to find the accessible facilities and had a coffee and a muffin in the coffee shop.  As I made my way out, I was surprised to pass several audio sets or audiovisual displays – and puzzled that no one had thought to mention them to me.  An opportunity to engage further that day or even in the future was lost and I felt some sadness that such a science institution should be so Neanderthal in “handling” disability.  

What a disappointing visit and rather a disgrace to the Science and Technology Sector.  I first visited this museum in 1969, but it seems that in 2012 there was no enlightenment, no science, no wonder and no encouragement.  I did get a few contact names written down on a piece of paper which I have just located.  (They were put in the back pocket of my trousers and thus absent for a while.) I am sure I left my name and email address, but to date have heard nothing. 

Natural History Museum

 

I walked down the road towards the Tube station and decided to risk another museum.  This entrance was through a maze and a security guard, thinking he was being helpful, kept barking turn left when he meant his left, i.e. my right.  Worthy of an Inspector Clouseau!

I asked for assistance at the main desk and the person stood up and called for a staff member.  I was invited to sit for a few minutes and Frances appeared shortly after with a friendly greeting of “How much time have you got?”  I had never been here before, so I had a short introduction and I found myself wanting to see the dinosaurs.  Why not? 

Frances took me through the geology section and after I explained I had studied one year of geology, read out a few labels which sounded interesting.  We passed through an area with many tactile models known as Final Impressions and there are many objects to touch, not only for the visually impaired.  There are fossils and I told Frances of my childhood visit to the Royal Scottish Museum with a selection of ammonites.  Frances duly found some. 

In reaching the Central Hall, cathedral like, of the museum I could appreciate it from the inside.  In the 1970s I had driven past it at night when it was floodlit.  In the dinosaur area I was able to walk around and Frances said if the object was not behind glass it could usually be touched.  We clambered up the equivalent of a tree tops walkway and passed the model of the Tyrannosaurus Rex. 

On the way back for the main exit I asked to see their early hominids and was taken upstairs.  I was helped in the shop and given the times of audio visual shows.  If I had wanted they could take me on after such a show.  This approach is not spoon feeding but making an obvious link by the institution. Frances took me out to the Cromwell Road exit and indicated by instruction a ramp to the tunnel entrance.

Summary:

 

While I may have been hard on the Science Museum - it was lunchtime -it is still disappointing and I am not the only one to complain about it.  At a recent lecture in the Royal Society of Chemistry, Professor Colquhoun said that an original plant for low density polyethylene was in the Science Museum. Hmm.

With the Natural History Museum, I may have been lucky in the timing as it was around 3pm.  Since my visit I have heard that some complaints about access for visually impaired people had been made.

Regarding shared space:

The idea of crossing this road must put off many visually impaired visitors to some museums. An unintended consequence and what should all stake holders do?

James White of Guide Dogs has sent me links for the Exhibition Road and their campaign. 

More information on the Streets Ahead campaign can be found on:
http://www.guidedogs.org.uk/supportus/campaigns/streets-ahead/.

With regards to Exhibition Road, this news article gives a good overview:

Sunday, 28 October 2012

Keeping up with Madame Perregaux: Sensation! The Art of Painting - Wallace Collection, London

*** update 27/11/2012

The next Sensation event will take place on 3rd January, 2013 and will be a seasonal celebration of the Christmas story with Bridget Crowley describing some paintings.  The link is here http://www.wallacecollection.org/collections/event/4759  .  Telephone the Wallace on 020 7563 9577 or email community@wallacecollection.org

*** end of update


24th October, 2012
 
The Wallace Collection holds these Sensation events from time to time and my first experience of one was on the subject of Illuminated Manuscripts, which opened a window in subjects I would have thought fairly inaccessible.   It sparked an interest in many related topics and how they are interconnected.   
(http://www.wallacecollection.org/visiting/access)

On this occasion, we gathered in the front of the entrance lobby and were guided down to the workshop area by Edwina Mileham and Jocelyn Clarke (Jos).  Although the session was from 1pm to 5pm we are encouraged to bring sandwiches, with the Wallace providing tea, coffee, chocolate biscuits and shortbread. I had spoken to Edwina prior to the workshop and learned that we would be mixing paint and that aprons would be provided. 

Edwina briefly introduced The Wallace Collection and the French pictures in the collection, saying we would be studying two works:  a portrait by Elisabeth-Louise Vigee Le Brun and a portrait by Jean-Baptiste Greuze.    Edwina also mentioned that Christoph Vogtherr, Director of the Collection, would be joining us to discuss art history in relation to the two pictures.

Vigee Le Brun’s portrait of Madame Perregaux is dated 1789 and has an interesting history, as does the painter herself.  Vigee Le Brun was the daughter of a painter and married into the art dealer trade, while keeping a position as a society painter of portraits.  She was well in with Marie Antoinette and had painted her in Vienna.  Vigee Le Brun had studied the techniques of the 17th Century artist Rubens and set out to paint a portrait with oil on wood rather than the follow the convention of her time, which was oil on canvas. 

The assembly of a wood panel had been quite a task of carpentry and in the time of Rubens the workshops of artists would have been full of workers engaged in carpentry, pigment preparation, manufacture of size, gesso and brushes.  All these steps were carried out by specialists of the time.  It was unusual, therefore, for a painting to be on wood as a cradle of 5 panels had to be assembled. 

The portrayal of the subject matter was also a bit of an anachronism.  Madame Perregaux is painted wearing Spanish costume of a century earlier, with predominantly black clothing set off with red highlights in the form of feathers in a hat and ribbons and piping on the dress.  White ruffs accentuate the face, and the body is framed with a curtain and a balustrade (probably not unlike the balustrade on the stairway in the Wallace Collection which came from the Banque de France).  The style of dress was familiar in the Spanish Netherlands or as part of Flemish Art. 

Jos described the painting of Madame Perregaux,  She is portrayed with a three quarter turning to the left of the painting.  Her left hand reaches towards curtains while her right hand holds on to a balustrade.  We had a discussion about the need for Vigee Le Brun to dress Madame Perregaux in a costume which was clearly of historic interest.  Christoph Vogtherr joined us and after finding where we had got to in the history of the painting, went on to describe the techniques used of the time. 

The Wallace Collection has had to relocate many of the paintings in the restoration programme of the Great Hall and we were given examples of how workshops and artists employed many skills in the production of a painting.  I hadn’t appreciated how long it took to make a painting in terms of allowing the oil to settle rather than dry out.  The number of layers in this painting is quite complex as the brush work involved in the drawing of the feathers and Madame’s hair is very fine.  We wondered about how often Madame would have actually sat for the painting.

Christoph then went on to introduce a painting by Greuze of Sophie Arnauld.  At first glance, this seemed very out of style until it was explained that the picture had been a sketch.  Artists in the 18th century would have made several sketches of their subject and it was important to get the face right in terms of the client’s wishes, with the other items such as the figure, dress and background being filled in at different times.  In the case of the Greuze painting, it had been bought and finished off years after Greuze.  On examination, the additions to this painting were removed revealing essentially the face of Sophie Arnauld without the conventional additions of the time. 

Christoph explained that much of the Wallace Collection has documentation regarding the sale documents and I asked how the Madame Perregaux came into the collection.  It turned out to have been sold by the family whose fortunes had declined and forced a sale.  Much of French art disappeared during the revolution and emerged in the sale rooms of the 19th century during the collecting period. 

Christoph also introduced the subject of different types of wood which were used in paintings.  Poplar wood is used in many Italian Renaissance paintings and in some cases has not aged well with considerable conservation interventions.  The northern European use of harder woods has made for more robust pictures, though painting surfaces can become abraded due to wear and tear of the wood through insect infestation, warping, lack of humidity control and temperature changes.  We were able to ask questions during Jos’s and Christoph’s explanations, and later in the workshop as they arose. 

We then had what I usually refer to as a Blue Peter moment where “something I prepared earlier” is passed round.  In this case it was a velvet hat with red plumes.  With little coaxing, I was able to model the said hat and pose in front of the picture itself for all to ‘see’. 
 
Professor Whitestick tries on a plumed velvet hat
thinking it was to do with the French Revolution! ;-)
 
We also passed round an intricate copy of the ruff worn by Madame Perregaux.  This has quite stiff (obviously starched) cotton with fine lace on the edges. 


Workshop


Edwina had prepared an example of a wooden surface, with the cradle structure showing the supports for the panels to prevent the warping of the wood through age.  (Tennis rackets when made of wood were kept in a press or frame to prevent warping) The surface of the wood had to be treated with special materials in order to get a really flat surface.  We passed around this cradle and this gave us a sense of what actually goes on behind the apparent first layer of a picture that is the wood itself.

Examples of linen canvas were also passed around and the texture of some of these fabrics could show through the finished picture without preparation.  Linen had to be sized with proprietary size made of animal bones boiled to make a gelatine or even a basic glue. Samples of crystallised size were passed around and sniffed; not much of a smell if any was the consensus. 

Jos described the application of gesso and even gesso grosso (I am afraid two of the Scottish contingent let the side down with this). Gesso is commonly known as gypsum or calcium sulphate and is described as whitening though not itself a white pigment.  The use of gesso allows controlled application of paint rather than have the paint colour bleed into the wood itself.  Jos said that even today many artists take a lot of time in preparing their working surface long before the application of any oil paint.   Commercially bought canvases are often primed in advance.

Next, Edwina passed round paint in the form of a roll of colours - we were to mix a yellow ochre oil paint later – from samples she had got for us from L.Cornelissen & Son.  Jos went through a list of colours and sources which could have been around at the time of the painting by Vigee Le Brun. These included carmine from cochineal beetle, azurite, ochres or earths, copper based colours such as malachite, verdigris (a common name for a green pigment), Rose madder (Alizirin), lamp black, Prussian blue (discovered in the early 1700s), vermilion (made from mercury or cinnabar), lead and tin oxides. 

There was a side discussion on the use of cow urine in the preparation of some colours.  This practice continued with a well-known producer of photographic film keeping a herd of cows for that purpose.  As sizing a canvas involved applying gesso or animal glue to the empty canvas, often old pieces of parchment or vellum were boiled up, essentially producing gelatine.  At this point, discussion veered into gelatine production problems on account of mad cow disease and the use of gelatine in photographic film. 

Various brushes were handed round including some using string to bind the hog bristles to a wooden handle, and ferrule brushes where the hair is clamped with a metal ferrule to the handle.  We also used a glass muller to mix pigments in an oil film on a marble surface.  Describing a figure of 8, the pigment is evenly distributed into the linseed oil and can be gathered with a palette knife or even picked up with a brush.  We had great fun doing this with various consistencies, and using brushes we painted our own ‘wooden’ panels. 

 
Prof Whitestick wearing a straw hat is seated with a muller (feels like a 3 cm curling stone) on a board
 and holding a palette knife in his right hand
 
One of the group thought that for an artist to take all this care and preparation, it must have been terrifying using the first brush stroke on the surface, though of course we realised that in a workshop studio, the preparation would be done by the apprentices. 

In conclusion, we thoroughly enjoyed four hours of art history and learned so much by being in front of the pictures, trying to compare our reproduction with the original, listening to the description history and techniques of the time and passing around a model of Madame Perregaux’s hat with the feathers and the ruff.  In the workshop afterwards, we learned and were able to handle a lot more to do with the actual painting procedures of the time.  In this instance, the Wallace Collection not only gave an audio description but we had the real bonus of handling examples of the costume and trying out some of the painting and processing techniques.  This wasn’t just a case of what the painting is, but a good example of how the painting works with a bonus of what makes the painting work. 

Many thanks to Christoph, Edwina and Jos for an interesting afternoon.
 

Professor Whitestick standing outside the Mary Weston Studio
within the Wallace Collection


 

Postscript


From a 1989 Wallace catalogue, Vigee Le Brun was said to have been “pleased with the likeness” in the Madame Perregaux portrait.  She was, however, dissatisfied with female dress of her own time and put all her efforts into making her paintings a little more ‘pittoresque’.  I had mentioned to Edwina about my visit to the Catherine the Great exhibition in Edinburgh during the summer and as Vigee Le Brun had spent sometime in St Petersburg, wondered if there was any mention of her in that catalogue.  Sure enough there was, I discovered when I got home. 
 
There was a painting titled “Daughters of the Emperor Paul I, the Grand Princesses Alexandra and Elena Pavlovna” dated 1796 (held in the State Hermitage Museum). However, according to the exhibition catalogue, Catherine the Great had not been impressed with the picture of her grandchildren, feeling that they looked like “pug dogs” or “repulsive little French peasant girls.” (p70)  Catherine ordered that the representation of the girls as “bacchantes” be removed, so that grapes were replaced with wreaths of flowers and bare arms were “concealed under their dresses.”  As the catalogue noted, Catherine the Great had rejected the baroque style at the start of her reign, and later also rejected any form of Sentimentalism and Romanticism.

Regarding the Greuze painting, the 1989 Wallace Catalogue states that “Cleaned by Lank in 1988 when overpainting in the lower area (summarily indicating the folds of a dress) was removed.”

Thursday, 25 October 2012

House of Lords, UK Parliament - Reception for VocalEyes


17th October

I was invited by VocalEyes to a reception in the River Room of the House of Lords (The second chamber in the UK Parliament).  The River Room is part of the area of the Palace of Westminster with a connection to the House of Lords and the Lord Speaker. These apartments had reached some notoriety when under the control of Lord Irvine of Lairg, a former Lord Chancellor.  Lord Irvine had supervised the installation of some very expensive wallpaper in the River Room and which we were able to admire during the reception. 

Nowadays the holder of the Lord Chancellor is the head of the Justice Ministry and sits as a Cabinet Minister in the House of Commons.  The issue of “Lords Reform” is currently stuck in the stasis of the present coalition government and the membership is appointed (for life), with some residual aristocratic input of (blue blood) just under 100 being eligible for election from a pool of hereditaries. 

During the State Opening of Parliament the Queen arrives in her coach which enters via an opening of the Victoria Tower.  The Victoria Tower is at the opposite end of the Palace of Westminster from the Clock Tower and the famous bell, Big Ben.  I entered the Palace of Westminster through gate 10, which is Black Rod’s Pass Office.  Black Rod is always shown marching down the Lobby to the House of Commons where the door is slammed in his face.  This part of the building harks back to many customs and yes, anachronisms, in the constitution which has evolved.  I went through security and joined James White from Guide Dogs. 

James had just finished a gruelling 3 weeks at the political party organised conferences in England - someone has to do the lobbying.  We chatted about items of common interest such as their anti clutter campaign, noises for electric cars and shared space issues. We were soon joined by Toby Davey the deputy director of VocalEyes, our hosts for the evening.  I had met Toby at Sight Village last year and also a couple of times at the Wellcome Collection. (We are pictured in the Grand Staircase of the Wellcome Building - http://profwhitestick.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/wellcome-collectionbrainsthe-thing-is.html )

After a few more arrivals we were escorted through the courtyards inside the complex and entered the approach to the apartments.  We walked along the passage way within the Victoria Tower which can take a coach and horses in procession.  I was greeted by Marylou from VocalEyes and my name badge was pinned on.  We were led to a lift and escorted to the River Room by the verger of the chapel.  

We entered the River Room which is decorated by paintings and sculptures.  There is a view across the River Thames directly and with another window there is a view downstream of the Millenium Wheel.  I could make this out along with Westminster Bridge.  I touched a Nymph (made of marble) as Roz Chalmers described it. There is also a statue of Narcissus and Roz described him to me. 
 
Roz was scheduled to demonstrate audio description in practice to the guests, some peers, some funders (Arts Council of England), other museums with interests in audio description (The Imperial War Museum) and contributors to the London Beyond Sight project.  The room was filling up and the VocalEyes supporters were introduced to me by Roz and Louise Fryer, who quizzed me about my lunchtime talk at the Wellcome Collection on synesthesia.  (Louise is doing a PhD at Goldsmiths and was interested in mirror neurons)

We were served with drinks and canapés and I wore my new hat as my hands were full with cane and glass.  I prefer to stand at networking functions and if I did not know to whom I was talking, I simply asked.  I recognised some voices from the theatre so having met Andrew Holland a few times at the National Theatre, I could simply greet him on a prompt “it is Andrew”.  Context is everything and I recognised the voice of Shami Chakrabarti of Liberty, though I had to ask Julia Neuberger who she was again.  I knew I was speaking to a member of the House of Lords but which one? 

The speeches were started by Lord Harrison, who asked the Lord Speaker, Baroness d’Souza, to say a few words. Toby Davey then gave an eloquent speech on access to galleries, museums and heritage sites.  While access to some collections was excellent in some cases (Toby cited the Wellcome Collection as being an exemplar), others were sadly either inadequate or assumed something to touch was all that was required.  We have both had some instances of inappropriate action on someone seeing a person with an obvious sight disability. (In case you do not know me, I am not deaf and do not respond to hand waving or being told I can only be accommodated on the day for the visually impaired which I should have looked up on their website before risking life and limb to get there.) 

Roz Chalmers then described the skills of an audio describer by demonstrating these through an example, in this case by describing an object from the British Museum African collection.  The object label gave context but I had no idea what it looked like, let alone how it worked.  A playback with Louise Fryer made the object appear to me as a two headed dog with a carved fur effect etc.  

It was time to continue ‘working’ the River Room and I was soon talking to Judy Dixey, the executive director of VocalEyes.  Judy had promoted the concept of London Beyond Sight and I was aware of it through both twitter and my local visually impaired group.  For more details of London Beyond Sight go to


Next, I was introduced to Lord Harrison and Lord (Earl) Howe.  We were chatting about the Olympics and Paralympic legacy and like many disabled people I expressed the view that with huge funding and sponsorship, many disabled people can achieve their potential.  Unfortunately not all of us can run 100 metres.  I steered the conversation to the cultural Olympic legacy and audio description in particular and asked Lord Howe to describe his tie, which he did quite well. 

The introductions continued and I met Vidar Hjardeng who recently stepped down as the chair of VocalEyes.  Both Judy and Vidar can be heard on an audio CD about London beyond sight.  Soon it was time to go and Marylou escorted me back to Westminster Underground making sure I was on the correct platform. 

Some of the people I spoke to and was introduced to were as follows:

Shami Chakrabarti
Roz Chalmers
Neil Darlison from Arts Council England
Toby Davey, Deputy Director of VocalEyes
Judy Dixey
Michael Elwyn
Louise Fryer
Lord Harrison of Chester
Vidar Hjardeng
Lord Howe
Marcel Jenkins
Marylou Lousvet, Chair of VocalEyes
Julia Neuberger
James White of Guide Dogs
 
Many thanks to VocalEyes for adding me to their guest list.  I have since added two of the London Beyond Sight audio descriptions to my Waterloo Sunset post (http://profwhitestick.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/waterloo-sunset-london-terminus-with.html). Both audio and text files on the site are useful in adding that piece of appropriate description for many London landmarks.  Judy Dixey would like to extend the concept of London Beyond Sight to other geographic spots and I think personally some Science Beyond Sight should be within reach if enough enlightened people can be found to do it.

Wednesday, 26 September 2012

Trainspotting: London Kings Cross Station and Orientation


*** update 26/10/2012

From Wednesday 31, October 2012, Network Rail is temporarily changing the way you exit King’s Cross station from platforms 0-8.  You will no longer be able to exit through the old concourse.  However, these exits will remain open:

Left on to York Way
Right into the Underground
Right through the new concourse

The closure is to allow the safe demolition of the old extension and the creation of a public square.
More details and maps can be found on: http://www.networkrail.co.uk/aspx/6288.aspx

*** end of update
 
19th September 2012

The Kings Cross area in London is still under reconstruction, though the end shape of the Kings Cross Terminus is now clearer and worth checking for yourself.  After the reopening of the St Pancras development I had an orientation tour of the main features and thought I would do the same for Kings Cross.  My first visit had been in 1969 and my last had been in 2011 when I returned from Hertford North. 


 
View of Kings Cross main entrance from Euston Road
22 November 2012


I entered through the old entrance and could make out the mazes for people standing in line for trains to Edinburgh, Glasgow and points north although the area was deserted.  I followed the sense of the direction to the platforms but a barrier directs you to a left turn in a new concourse.  Having found an information desk, I asked if it would be possible to be given an orientation tour and Craig Tomlin, the duty station manager from Network Rail came and took me round. 

Craig asked what sort of journeys I might want to make and how would I normally arrive at Kings Cross-St Pancras.  He then took me out of the new concourse to a point near Pancras Road, where I could make out the Train Shed of St Pancras.  I recognised the pathway to the side entrance to that station and we started to go back into Kings Cross.  This is a neat way of “wayfinding” as I could start to lay my reel of cotton (metaphorically speaking) so that I could map my movements from a sound base. 

We then passed by Platforms 11,10 and 9 which are the platforms used for local services provided by First Capital Connect (FCC).  This company has a cornflower or powder blue livery for ticket machines and I could sense the “blue” glow without knowing what they were.  The accessible toilets are behind a turnstile and Craig told me how to gain access.  We then entered the main train shed with platforms 8 down to 1 (There is a trackline for Platform 0)  The train shed has been re-fitted and totally re-covered with glass and some solar panels which generate about 20% of the station’s power needs.

The original frontage of this station has been uncovered and with much of the later additions to be removed, will result in a large space adjoining Euston Road.  The new development has much natural light and an open skeletal structure with ribs supporting the glass roof.  There are some monoliths which may have projections and there is a lot of stone and steel.  


View of St Pancras International along Pancras Road
22 November 2012
 

Craig suggested I think of the station as a capital L with the horizontal limb at an angle to Euston Road.  We then retraced our way to the concourse and Craig indicated where there were potential human bottlenecks, with attention focussed on destination boards and sudden movement to the platform.  This is to be expected in any station but it was thoughtful to be made aware of these points. 

After taking me round the station Craig took me over Pancras Road following the tactile surfaces.  We discussed them as they align to a tactile crossing in Pancras Road.  Entering the side entrance to St Pancras, Craig took me to the FCC help desk and the duty staff took me to the Thameslink platform where I was put on a train home. 

This orientation tour was a real confidence booster.  While the track layout is essentially the same, the station has been effectively relocated and is brand new. 

Many thanks to Craig, Network Rail and FCC.   This was undertaken with no advance planning and indicates an awareness in some of our transport management structures. It is worth noting that the London Underground staff at this station (Kings Cross-St Pancras are always approachable as are the staff in St Pancras main station.

First Capital Connect website : http://www.firstcapitalconnect.co.uk/
Network Rail website: http://www.networkrail.co.uk/
Website for King’s Cross: http://www.networkrail.co.uk/aspx/867.aspx